Saturday, December 31, 2005

Happy New Year

Recipe for a Happy New Year

Take twelve whole months
Cleanse them thoroughly of all bitterness, hate and jealousy,
Make the as fresh and clean as possible.

Now cut each month into 28, 30 or 31 equal but different parts,
Don't make up a whole batch at once,
Prepare it one day at a time out of these ingredients...

Mix well into each day on part faith,
One part of patience and one part of courage,
And one part of work.

Add to each day one part of hope,
Faithfulness, generosity and kindness.
Blend with one part prayer, one part meditation,
And one good deed.

Season the whole with a dash of good spirits,
A sprinkle of fun, a pinch of play,
Add a cupful of good humor.

Pour all this into a vessel of love.

Cook thoroughly over radiant joy, garnish with a smile,
And serve with quietness, unselfishness and cheerfulness.
Follow this recipe closely and you are bound to yield a Happy New Year.

The new year lies before us like a blanket of new fallen snow....
Be careful how you tread on it for every mark will show.

PETA Staffer Legally Changes Name to KentuckyFriedCruelty.com

Friday, December 30, 2005

Treasury Sectretary-US Will Be Out Of Cash In 2 Months

They sure are doing a bang up job on Capitol Hill

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051230/ts_afp/uspoliticseconomy

NSA Tracking Their Website's Visitor's Activities

With all the brouhaha in recent weeks over the wiretapping issue, I visited the NSA's website last week. I hope I don't get a knock on my door because I disagree with Bush's policies and am targeted as a threat to national security...lol.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051229/ap_on_hi_te/spy_agency_privacy

Thursday, December 29, 2005

Bush Says He Has Inherent Constitutional Right

Where in the Second Article of the Constitution does it speak of inherent rights of the President?

Article 2 - The Executive Branch
Section 2 - Civilian Power over Military, Cabinet, Pardon Power, Appointments
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

FISA was created to ensure that the governement does not overstep their boundaries, in terms of citizen's constitutional rights to privacy. The FISA laws are clear:

"Under the Fourth Amendment, a search warrant must be based on probable cause to believe that a crime has been or is being committed. This is not the general rule under FISA:

Surveillance under FISA is permitted based on a finding of probable cause that the surveillance target is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power, irrespective of whether the target is suspected of engaging in criminal activity. However, if the target is a "U.S. person," there must be probable cause to believe that the U.S. person's activities may involve espionage or other similar conduct in violation of the criminal statutes of the United States. Nor may a U.S. person be determined to be an agent of a foreign power "solely upon the basis of activities protected by the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States.""A recently disclosed FBI memo reveals that agents illegally videotaped suspects, intercepted e-mails without court permission, recorded the wrong phone conversations, and allowed electronic surveillance operations to run beyond their legal deadline, during sensitive terrorism investigations. The mistakes referenced in the internal memo are different than those delineated and criticized in May by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The existence of the memo was first revealed in documents EPIC obtained in a FOIA lawsuit. (Oct. 10, 2002)"
http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/fis

"Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for a period not to exceed fifteen calendar days following a declaration of war by the Congress".
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/u

CHAPTER 36 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1802 Prev Next § 1802. Electronic surveillance authorization without court order; certification by Attorney General; reports to Congressional committees; transmittal under seal; duties and compensation of communication common carrier; applications; jurisdiction of courtRelease date: 2005-03-17

(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—

(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at— (i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801 (a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or (ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801 (a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; ( there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and (C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801 (h) of this title; and if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.

(2) An electronic surveillance authorized by this subsection may be conducted only in accordance with the Attorney General’s certification and the minimization procedures adopted by him. The Attorney General shall assess compliance with such procedures and shall report such assessments to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence under the provisions of section 1808 (a) of this title.

(3) The Attorney General shall immediately transmit under seal to the court established under section 1803 (a) of this title a copy of his certification. Such certification shall be maintained under security measures established by the Chief Justice with the concurrence of the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of Central Intelligence, and shall remain sealed unless— (A) an application for a court order with respect to the surveillance is made under sections 1801 (h)(4) and 1804 of this title; or ( the certification is necessary to determine the legality of the surveillance under section 1806 (f) of this title.

(4) With respect to electronic surveillance authorized by this subsection, the Attorney General may direct a specified communication common carrier to— (A) furnish all information, facilities, or technical assistance necessary to accomplish the electronic surveillance in such a manner as will protect its secrecy and produce a minimum of interference with the services that such carrier is providing its customers; and ( maintain under security procedures approved by the Attorney General and the Director of Central Intelligence any records concerning the surveillance or the aid furnished which such carrier wishes to retain. The Government shall compensate, at the prevailing rate, such carrier for furnishing such aid. (b) Applications for a court order under this subchapter are authorized if the President has, by written authorization, empowered the Attorney General to approve applications to the court having jurisdiction under section 1803 of this title, and a judge to whom an application is made may, notwithstanding any other law, grant an order, in conformity with section 1805 of this title, approving electronic surveillance of a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence information, except that the court shall not have jurisdiction to grant any order approving electronic surveillance directed solely as described in paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (a) of this section unless such surveillance may involve the acquisition of communications of any United States person.

The above is taken from FISA regulations. Even with the Attorney General's Approval, court orders must be gotten if it involves a US citizen, if retroactively.

Now Bush is trying to differentiate between wiretaps for monitoring purposes and wiretaps for detection purposes. Some claim the FISA is only applicable for monitoring purposes. I do not see any differentiation in any wiretapping laws that I have seen, that makes a distinction between the two.


Europe Has Posters Depicting Queen/Bush Sex

Ok, this crosses the line, even for me.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/print?id=1450412

Wednesday, December 28, 2005

Bush And Spying:Checks, No Balances

I believe that we have to do everything we can to protect this country, but it is very easy to get a court order, and it can even be three days retroactive. Bush says it's about national security. It is not about national security. It is about his desire to expand the executive power of the presidency. After all, does he really think that terrorists are going to care one way or another if they are being wiretapped? Does he really think that they will stop communicating? He says that revealing his plot is giving the terrorists the upper hand. They are willing to die for their disgusting cause. They have the upper hand regardless. The NY Times revealing this information doesn't change things one way or the other. Well, except for Bush. Yes, we have to have surveillance for suspected terrorists, but there does have to be balance, or how far will it go?

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0552,schanberg,71325,6.html

Mr. Cheney's Imperial Presidency-NY Times Editorial

Editorial: Mr. Cheney's Imperial Presidency December 23, 2005New York Times

George W. Bush has quipped several times during his political career that it would be so much easier to govern in a dictatorship. Apparently he never told his vice president that this was a joke.

Virtually from the time he chose himself to be Mr. Bush's running mate in 2000, Dick Cheney has spearheaded an extraordinary expansion of the powers of the presidency - from writing energy policy behind closed doors with oil executives to abrogating longstanding treaties and using the 9/11 attacks as a pretext to invade Iraq, scrap the Geneva Conventions and spy on American citizens.

It was a chance Mr. Cheney seems to have been dreaming about for decades. Most Americans looked at wrenching events like the Vietnam War, the Watergate scandal and the Iran-contra debacle and worried that the presidency had become too powerful, secretive and dismissive.

Mr. Cheney looked at the same events and fretted that the presidency was not powerful enough, and too vulnerable to inspection and calls for accountability.

The president "needs to have his constitutional powers unimpaired, if you will, in terms of the conduct of national security policy," Mr. Cheney said this week as he tried to stifle the outcry over a domestic spying program that Mr. Bush authorized after the 9/11 attacks.

Before 9/11, Mr. Cheney was trying to undermine the institutional and legal structure of multilateral foreign policy: he championed the abrogation of the Antiballistic Missile Treaty with Moscow in order to build an antimissile shield that doesn't work but makes military contractors rich. Early in his tenure, Mr. Cheney, who quit as chief executive of Halliburton to run with Mr. Bush in 2000, gathered his energy industry cronies at secret meetings in Washington to rewrite energy policy to their specifications. Mr. Cheney offered the usual excuses about the need to get candid advice on important matters, and the courts, sadly, bought it. But the task force was not an exercise in diverse views. Mr. Cheney gathered people who agreed with him, and allowed them to write national policy for an industry in which he had recently amassed a fortune.

The effort to expand presidential power accelerated after 9/11, taking advantage of a national consensus that the president should have additional powers to use judiciously against terrorists.

Mr. Cheney started agitating for an attack on Iraq immediately, pushing the intelligence community to come up with evidence about a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda that never existed. His team was central to writing the legal briefs justifying the abuse and torture of prisoners, the idea that the president can designate people to be "unlawful enemy combatants" and detain them indefinitely, and a secret program allowing the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on American citizens without warrants. And when Senator John McCain introduced a measure to reinstate the rule of law at American military prisons, Mr. Cheney not only led the effort to stop the amendment, but also tried to revise it to actually legalize torture at C.I.A. prisons.

There are finally signs that the democratic system is trying to rein in the imperial presidency. Republicans in the Senate and House forced Mr. Bush to back the McCain amendment, and Mr. Cheney's plan to legalize torture by intelligence agents was rebuffed. Congress also agreed to extend the Patriot Act for five weeks rather than doing the administration's bidding and rushing to make it permanent.

On Wednesday, a federal appeals court refused to allow the administration to transfer Jose Padilla, an American citizen who has been held by the military for more than three years on suspicion of plotting terrorist attacks, from military to civilian custody. After winning the same court's approval in September to hold Mr. Padilla as an unlawful combatant, the administration abruptly reversed course in November and charged him with civil crimes unrelated to his arrest.

That decision was an obvious attempt to avoid having the Supreme Court review the legality of the detention powers that Mr. Bush gave himself, and the appeals judges refused to go along.

Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney have insisted that the secret eavesdropping program is legal, but The Washington Post reported yesterday that the court created to supervise this sort of activity is not so sure. It said that the presiding judge was arranging a classified briefing for her fellow judges and that several judges on the court wanted to know why the administration believed eavesdropping on American citizens without warrants was legal when the law specifically required such warrants.

Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney are tenacious. They still control both houses of Congress and are determined to pack the judiciary with like-minded ideologues. Still, the recent developments are encouraging, especially since the court ruling on Mr. Padilla was written by a staunch conservative considered by President Bush for the Supreme Court

UN Rejects New Iraq Vote

U.N. Rejects Sunni Demand for New Vote in Iraq

By SABRINA TAVERNISE
Published: December 28, 2005

BAGHDAD, Iraq, Dec. 28 - A United Nations official today announced publicly for the first time that he believed the results of the Dec. 15 Iraqi parliamentary election appeared valid, and he said demands by some groups for a new vote were unjustified.

The announcement, made at a news conference in Baghdad, is bound to disappoint some Sunni Arab political parties, which had claimed that ballot-box stuffing and other fraud distorted the election results. Although it does not have the power to overturn results of the election, the United Nations figured prominently in organizing the vote, and its public show of support bolstered Iraqi authorities' claims that the vote was legitimate.

"The U.N. is of the view that these elections were transparent and credible," said the official, Craig Jenness, who led the agency's election coordination effort here. He added that although all complaints must be weighed thoroughly, "we at the U.N. see no justification in calls for a re-run of the elections."

Several Sunni parties, as well as some secular groups, have called for the authorities to hold a new vote, but that demand now looks unlikely to be met. Abdul Hussein al-Hindawi, an electoral commission board member, read a statement at the conference that said the commission planned on canceling some ballots in some areas, but that it had all but ruled out holding a new vote because it had not found evidence of widespread forgery.

"There are individual violations without wide, systematic forgery operations," Mr. Hindawi said.
Even as the Iraqi authorities appeared to be closing the door on complaints of fraud, Sunni Arab parties continued to press their demands. Demonstrations that have been organized to protest the results of the election over the past week continued today, with a large crowd filling an area near the government building in Samarra, north of Baghdad, and protesters gathering in Baquba, northeast of Baghdad.

Dhafir al-Ani, the spokesman for the main Sunni alliance, the Iraqi Consensus Front, which has been vocal in its criticism of the results, said that his group rejected the conclusion put forth by Mr. Jenness, and that they would continue to ask for a new vote.

"Several international workers sitting inside the Green Zone are not able to evaluate the election matter," he said by telephone today. "We still believe that huge fraud happened in the Iraqi election and it completely changed the results."

Mr. Jenness said the United Nations team that assisted the election was made up of 50 international experts. The vote was also monitored by 120,000 observers, he said.

Mr. Hindawi said that the commission would cancel forged ballots in polling stations in Baghdad, the northern cities of Erbil, Kirkuk, and the provinces of Anbar in the west, Nineveh in the north and Diyala in central Iraq. In addition, two teams of investigators are reviewing results in the southern cities of Babel and Basra. The results of the ballot reviews are expected to be announced within the next few days, Mr. Hindawi said.

In Baghdad today, an inmate in a high-security prison in the Kadhimiya neighborhood grabbed an AK-47 from a guard during a routine morning outing, shot him dead, and began freeing other prisoners, including a citizen of Saudi Arabia, officials said.

Iraqi solders eventually quelled the revolt, which began at around 6 a.m., said Brig. Gen. Jaleel Khalaf, a commander who was among the forces. About 16 prisoners were involved in the revolt, according to a statement from the American military, which participated in bringing the incident under control, and all of them were accounted for.

The prison holds about 215 high-security inmates and is located within an Iraqi Army base. In all, nine people, including four prisoners, an interpreter and four prison guards, were killed. One American soldier and five prisoners were injured, the military said.

The military also reported the death of an American marine, who was killed by small-arms fire in Khalidiya in the volatile western province of Anbar on Dec. 26.

In Dhibai, a village about 40 miles north of Baghdad, gunmen killed two soldiers and wounded seven in an ambush on an Iraqi army patrol on Tuesday, according to Reuters. Insurgents first struck the patrol with a roadside bomb, and then fired on the soldiers.

The election developments came as Shiite and Kurdish leaders met in northern Iraq to discuss forming a government that would include representatives from all of Iraq's religious and ethnic groups. Abdul Aziz Hakim, the head of the Shiite coalition that is expected to capture the largest share of votes that were cast in the election, met with Masoud Barzani, the leader of the Kurdish Democratic Party, and said that he had held "preliminary consultations" on the formation of a government but that talks were still in the very early stages. He indicated that the Sunnis were not yet involved.

"We need to evaluate the previous alliance and study its weaknesses and strengths," Mr. Hakim said at a news conference with Mr. Barzani, The Associated Press reported from the city of Erbil in the Kurdish enclave. "Then we will try to include the others."

Reporting for this article was contributed by Qais Mizher, Abdul Razzaq al-Saiedi and Khalid al-Ansary.

40 Year Study-Vitamin D May Cut Cancer In Half

my space tracker