Rumsfeld Says London Attack Not In Retalliation For Iraq War

And what makes him so sure of this? Why is he so quick to dimiss this theory? He is quick to dismiss it because he does not want to deal woth this kind of pressure. Terrorists have held captives in exchange for troop withdrawal. It is possible. It is also possible that Rumsfeld will ignore a possible reason for the attacks to save the administration. Politics as usual.

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGB5VRQFZBE.html